Source authenticated

Araujo-Piga-Schacht Question on Tight Hamilton Cycles

the question is answered negatively and the correct threshold is determined

Exact FrontierDelta

disproved→disproved

Scope and record

Occurred: Oct 29, 2026

Delta type: REGISTRY REVISION

Assumptions: VibeMathed verification: unreviewed. Publication: preprint. AI contribution: ai-assisted. VibeMathed editorial classifications, scores, notes, relations, and dataset structure are CC BY 4.0. Source statements and linked content retain their own rights.

Canonical aliases: Araujo-Piga-Schacht Question on Tight Hamilton Cycles · Tight Hamilton cycles

Confidence: Not scored

Registry verification: unreviewed · preprint · resolved

Open the source record ↗

Attribution

VibeMathed
registry · event recorded by

ChatGPT
model · ai model contributor · OpenAI

Xichao Shu
human · human collaborator

Lineage and corrections

Corrects Araujo-Piga-Schacht Question on Tight Hamilton Cycles →

Supersedes Araujo-Piga-Schacht Question on Tight Hamilton Cycles →

Han et al 2021 - Problem statement evidence for this event

VibeMathed record: Araujo-Piga-Schacht Question on Tight Hamilton Cycles evidence for this event

the question is answered negatively and the correct threshold is determined parent of this event

This event attributed to ChatGPT

Araujo-Piga-Schacht Question on Tight Hamilton Cycles parent of this event

This event attributed to Xichao Shu

Araujo-Piga-Schacht Question on Tight Hamilton Cycles evidence for this event

Act on this frontier

Verify, challenge, or extend the result.

Araujo-Piga-Schacht Question on Tight Hamilton Cycles — Mathematical Frontier Network