Source authenticated

Dihedral and cyclic Ramsey numbers of the alternating 3-path

The a = 3 slice is settled outright. The parent conjecture's dihedral side has since been resolved for every a >= 4 as well (see the related entry), so Conjecture 4.9's claim 1 + (a-1)(b-1) now stands proved for all a >= 3; the trivial a = 1, 2 cases and the cyclic analogue for a >= 4 remain formally unaddressed.

Exact FrontierDelta

Prior state unknown→proved

Scope and record

Occurred: Aug 12, 2026

Delta type: SOURCE CLAIM

Assumptions: VibeMathed verification: site-confirmed. Publication: preprint. AI contribution: ai-discovered. Editorial metadata: CC BY 4.0; linked content retains its own rights.

Canonical aliases: Dihedral and cyclic Ramsey numbers of the alternating 3-path · $R_{dih}(P_3^{alt},K_b)=2b-1$

Confidence: Not scored

Registry verification: site confirmed · preprint · resolved

Open the source record ↗

Attribution

VibeMathed
registry · event recorded by

Claude Fable 5
model · ai model contributor · Anthropic

Artifacts and verifiers

sat/ - regenerated CNFs, DRAT certificates, witnesses and solver logs (commit 01a50c7)

code · pending

Artifact ↗

Compute record

No linked compute attempts recorded.

Lineage and corrections

This event attributed to Claude Fable 5

Dihedral and cyclic Ramsey numbers of the alternating 3-path parent of this event

Dihedral and cyclic Ramsey numbers of the alternating 3-path evidence for this event

sat/ - regenerated CNFs, DRAT certificates, witnesses and solver logs (commit 01a50c7) evidence for this event

Damnjanovic and Djordjevic, Computation of small reflective and dihedral Ramsey numbers (Conjecture 4.9) evidence for this event

Basic, Damnjanovic, Stevanovic and Stosic (Conjecture 4.23) evidence for this event

VibeMathed record: Dihedral and cyclic Ramsey numbers of the alternating 3-path evidence for this event

The a = 3 slice is settled outright. The parent conjecture's dihedral side has since been resolved for every a >= 4 as well (see the related entry), so Conjecture 4.9's claim 1 + (a-1)(b-1) now stands proved for all a >= 3; the trivial a = 1, 2 cases and the cyclic analogue for a >= 4 remain formally unaddressed. parent of this event

Act on this frontier

Verify, challenge, or extend the result.