Source authenticated

Djament's Problem on Locally Noetherian Grothendieck Categories

the locally noetherian case; whether such a category can fail to admit a projective generator is left open as Problem 1.3

Exact FrontierDelta

disproved→disproved

Scope and record

Occurred: Oct 29, 2026

Delta type: REGISTRY REVISION

Assumptions: VibeMathed verification: unreviewed. Publication: preprint. AI contribution: ai-assisted. VibeMathed editorial classifications, scores, notes, relations, and dataset structure are CC BY 4.0. Source statements and linked content retain their own rights.

Canonical aliases: Djament's Problem on Locally Noetherian Grothendieck Categories · Djament's problem

Confidence: Not scored

Registry verification: unreviewed · preprint · partial

Open the source record ↗

Attribution

VibeMathed
registry · event recorded by

ChatGPT (GPT-5.5, GPT-5.6)
model · ai model contributor · OpenAI

Ryo Kanda
human · human collaborator

Lineage and corrections

Corrects Djament's Problem on Locally Noetherian Grothendieck Categories →

Supersedes Djament's Problem on Locally Noetherian Grothendieck Categories →

Djament's Problem on Locally Noetherian Grothendieck Categories parent of this event

Martini et al 2025, Problem 5.13 - Problem statement evidence for this event

This event attributed to Ryo Kanda

VibeMathed record: Djament's Problem on Locally Noetherian Grothendieck Categories evidence for this event

Djament's Problem on Locally Noetherian Grothendieck Categories evidence for this event

This event attributed to ChatGPT (GPT-5.5, GPT-5.6)

the locally noetherian case; whether such a category can fail to admit a projective generator is left open as Problem 1.3 parent of this event

Act on this frontier

Verify, challenge, or extend the result.