Source authenticated

New Bounds for Double Covers of the Discrete Box

Improved bounds rather than a settled question: the asked-for inequality is not established in general.

Exact FrontierDelta

proved→proved

Scope and record

Occurred: Oct 29, 2026

Delta type: REGISTRY REVISION

Assumptions: VibeMathed verification: lean-checked. Publication: preprint. AI contribution: ai-co-developed. VibeMathed editorial classifications, scores, notes, relations, and dataset structure are CC BY 4.0. Source statements and linked content retain their own rights.

Canonical aliases: New Bounds for Double Covers of the Discrete Box · Double covers of ${0,1,2}^d$

Confidence: Not scored

Registry verification: lean checked · preprint · partial

Open the source record ↗

Attribution

VibeMathed
registry · event recorded by

Claude
model · ai model contributor · Anthropic

Patrick White
human · human collaborator

Artifacts and verifiers

Github repo of the proof

lean artifact · pending

Artifact ↗

Compute record

No linked compute attempts recorded.

Lineage and corrections

Corrects New Bounds for Double Covers of the Discrete Box →

Supersedes New Bounds for Double Covers of the Discrete Box →

Improved bounds rather than a settled question: the asked-for inequality is not established in general. parent of this event

New Bounds for Double Covers of the Discrete Box evidence for this event

This event attributed to Claude

Github repo of the proof evidence for this event

This event attributed to Patrick White

Leader et al 2017, Question 4: Problem statement evidence for this event

New Bounds for Double Covers of the Discrete Box parent of this event

VibeMathed record: New Bounds for Double Covers of the Discrete Box evidence for this event

Act on this frontier

Verify, challenge, or extend the result.