Disputed

The generalized Lax conjecture: is every hyperbolicity cone spectrahedral?

Theorem 1.1 (September 24): the degree-20 polynomial p(X,Z,y)=det⁡((det⁡X)Z−Φy(adjX))p(X,Z,y)=\det((\det X)Z-\Phi_y(\mathrm{adj}X)) on Sym4×Sym4×R3\mathrm{Sym}_4\times\mathrm{Sym}_4\times\mathbb R^3 is hyperbolic with respect to (I4,I4,0)(I_4,I_4,0), and its closed hyperbolicity cone equals {L⪰0}\{L\succeq0\} for no finite real linear pencil LL. Corollary: the degree-16 quotient q=p/det⁡Xq=p/\det X has the same cone. The polynomial is not strictly hyperbolic, consistent with the Kummer-Netzer theorem for strictly hyperbolic polynomials. This cone does have a semidefinite lift with auxiliary variables (companion, October 5); the stronger statement that some hyperbolicity cone has no lift at all is the separate Projected Lax entry.

Exact FrontierDelta

Prior state unknown→disproved

Scope and record

Occurred: Sep 24, 2026

Delta type: SOURCE CLAIM

Assumptions: VibeMathed verification: contested. Publication: announcement. AI contribution: ai-discovered. VibeMathed editorial classifications, scores, notes, relations, and dataset structure are CC BY 4.0. Source statements and linked content retain their own rights.

Canonical aliases: The generalized Lax conjecture: is every hyperbolicity cone spectrahedral? · Generalized Lax conjecture

Confidence: Not scored

Registry verification: contested · announcement · candidate

Open the source record ↗

Attribution

VibeMathed
registry · event recorded by

Unreleased internal OpenAI model
model · ai model contributor · OpenAI

Artifacts and verifiers

Lean proof (OAI.Paper256.main_result)

lean artifact · pending

Artifact ↗
Comparator statement: HyperbolicCones.lean

lean artifact · pending

Artifact ↗

Compute record

No linked compute attempts recorded.

Lineage and corrections

The Projected Lax Conjecture: is every hyperbolicity cone a spectrahedral shadow? evidence for this event

This event attributed to Unreleased internal OpenAI model

Companion: An Exact Semidefinite Lift of a Nonspectrahedral Hyperbolicity Cone evidence for this event

Companion: A nonspectrahedral hyperbolicity cone evidence for this event

Theorem 1.1 (September 24): the degree-20 polynomial p(X,Z,y)=det⁡((det⁡X)Z−Φy(adjX))p(X,Z,y)=\det((\det X)Z-\Phi_y(\mathrm{adj}X)) on Sym4×Sym4×R3\mathrm{Sym}_4\times\mathrm{Sym}_4\times\mathbb R^3 is hyperbolic with respect to (I4,I4,0)(I_4,I_4,0), and its closed hyperbolicity cone equals {L⪰0}\{L\succeq0\} for no finite real linear pencil LL. Corollary: the degree-16 quotient q=p/det⁡Xq=p/\det X has the same cone. The polynomial is not strictly hyperbolic, consistent with the Kummer-Netzer theorem for strictly hyperbolic polynomials. This cone does have a semidefinite lift with auxiliary variables (companion, October 5); the stronger statement that some hyperbolicity cone has no lift at all is the separate Projected Lax entry. parent of this event

Lean proof (OAI.Paper256.main_result) evidence for this event

The generalized Lax conjecture: is every hyperbolicity cone spectrahedral? parent of this event

VibeMathed record: The generalized Lax conjecture: is every hyperbolicity cone spectrahedral? evidence for this event

Comparator statement: HyperbolicCones.lean evidence for this event

Act on this frontier

Verify, challenge, or extend the result.