lean artifact · pending
Artifact ↗A uniform bound of three on generalized star height (the generalized star-height problem)
Claims Theorem 1.1: for every finite alphabet and every regular , , using expressions over itself with complement in . Companions prove the weaker bounds 13 and 4 by different constructions. It does NOT exhibit any language of generalized star height greater than one, does not decide whether height one always suffices, gives no algorithm for computing , and bounds neither expression size nor running time.
Exact FrontierDelta
Scope and record
Occurred: Sep 25, 2026
Delta type: SOURCE CLAIM
Assumptions: VibeMathed verification: lean-checked. Publication: announcement. AI contribution: ai-discovered. VibeMathed editorial classifications, scores, notes, relations, and dataset structure are CC BY 4.0. Source statements and linked content retain their own rights.
Canonical aliases: A uniform bound of three on generalized star height (the generalized star-height problem) · Generalized star height at most three
Confidence: Not scored
Registry verification: lean checked · announcement · partial
Attribution
VibeMathed
registry · event recorded by
Unreleased internal OpenAI model
model · ai model contributor · OpenAI
Artifacts and verifiers
lean artifact · pending
Artifact ↗Compute record
No linked compute attempts recorded.
Lineage and corrections
VibeMathed record: A uniform bound of three on generalized star height (the generalized star-height problem) evidence for this event
This event attributed to Unreleased internal OpenAI model
A uniform bound of three on generalized star height (the generalized star-height problem) evidence for this event
Lean: solution module for the height-three bound evidence for this event
Companion: Generalized Star Height at Most Four evidence for this event
Straubing (2002), On logical descriptions of regular languages evidence for this event
A uniform bound of three on generalized star height (the generalized star-height problem) parent of this event
Claims Theorem 1.1: for every finite alphabet and every regular , , using expressions over itself with complement in . Companions prove the weaker bounds 13 and 4 by different constructions. It does NOT exhibit any language of generalized star height greater than one, does not decide whether height one always suffices, gives no algorithm for computing , and bounds neither expression size nor running time. parent of this event
Lean comparator statement: generalized star height at most three evidence for this event
Companion: Finite Monoid Computations and a Uniform Generalized Star-Height Bound (bound 13) evidence for this event
Act on this frontier