Goldbach's conjecture for the Liouville function
True: for every even there are positive with and , unconditionally, with no analytic or conjectural hypothesis. The route reduces to a prime modulus, then uses to force to agree with the Legendre symbol on an interval, where quadratic reciprocity gives a contradiction; no sieve is used, which is how the parity obstruction is avoided. Two pieces of context a reader needs. Mangerel (IMRN 2024) proved that cannot be constant for ; that yields a pair with opposite signs and so does NOT imply this statement. And the result has since been generalised: on the same MathOverflow question, Lingsen Meng gives an unconditional argument that all four sign pairs occur for every , covering odd too, while crediting this work as independent and prior for the even case.
Exact FrontierDelta
Scope and record
Occurred: Sep 16, 2026
Delta type: SOURCE CLAIM
Assumptions: VibeMathed verification: lean-verified. Publication: announcement. AI contribution: ai-discovered. VibeMathed editorial classifications, scores, notes, relations, and dataset structure are CC BY 4.0. Source statements and linked content retain their own rights.
Canonical aliases: Goldbach's conjecture for the Liouville function · Liouville-Goldbach
Confidence: Not scored
Registry verification: lean verified · announcement · resolved
Attribution
VibeMathed
registry · event recorded by
ChatGPT-6 Astra
model · ai model contributor · OpenAI
Lineage and corrections
MathOverflow 307479, where the question was asked and later corroborated evidence for this event
This event attributed to ChatGPT-6 Astra
True: for every even there are positive with and , unconditionally, with no analytic or conjectural hypothesis. The route reduces to a prime modulus, then uses to force to agree with the Legendre symbol on an interval, where quadratic reciprocity gives a contradiction; no sieve is used, which is how the parity obstruction is avoided. Two pieces of context a reader needs. Mangerel (IMRN 2024) proved that cannot be constant for ; that yields a pair with opposite signs and so does NOT imply this statement. And the result has since been generalised: on the same MathOverflow question, Lingsen Meng gives an unconditional argument that all four sign pairs occur for every , covering odd too, while crediting this work as independent and prior for the even case. parent of this event
Goldbach's conjecture for the Liouville function parent of this event
Mangerel's GRH-conditional four-pattern result evidence for this event
Goldbach's conjecture for the Liouville function evidence for this event
VibeMathed record: Goldbach's conjecture for the Liouville function evidence for this event
Act on this frontier