lean artifact · pending
Artifact ↗Heilbronn's triangle problem: a power-saving lower bound n^(-2+eta), refuting the almost n^-2 upper bound
Theorem 1.1: absolute constants and with for every . Hence the almost upper-bound formulation is false. The construction samples integer columns in a box with finite-field norm congruence conditions and deletes the few small triangles; is explicit but extremely small. It does not determine the order of : the gap to the upper bound remains, and no conjecture for the true exponent is made.
Exact FrontierDelta
Scope and record
Occurred: Sep 25, 2026
Delta type: SOURCE CLAIM
Assumptions: VibeMathed verification: lean-checked. Publication: announcement. AI contribution: ai-discovered. VibeMathed editorial classifications, scores, notes, relations, and dataset structure are CC BY 4.0. Source statements and linked content retain their own rights.
Canonical aliases: Heilbronn's triangle problem: a power-saving lower bound n^(-2+eta), refuting the almost n^-2 upper bound · Heilbronn triangle power lower bound
Confidence: Not scored
Registry verification: lean checked · announcement · partial
Attribution
VibeMathed
registry · event recorded by
Unreleased internal OpenAI model
model · ai model contributor · OpenAI
Artifacts and verifiers
lean artifact · pending
Artifact ↗Compute record
No linked compute attempts recorded.
Lineage and corrections
VibeMathed record: Heilbronn's triangle problem: a power-saving lower bound n^(-2+eta), refuting the almost n^-2 upper bound evidence for this event
This event attributed to Unreleased internal OpenAI model
Comparator statement: HeilbronnTriangle.lean evidence for this event
Erdos Problem #507 (Heilbronn's triangle problem) evidence for this event
Heilbronn's triangle problem: a power-saving lower bound n^(-2+eta), refuting the almost n^-2 upper bound parent of this event
Heilbronn's triangle problem: a power-saving lower bound n^(-2+eta), refuting the almost n^-2 upper bound evidence for this event
Lean proof (OAI.Problem355.heilbronn_power_lower_bound) evidence for this event
Theorem 1.1: absolute constants and with for every . Hence the almost upper-bound formulation is false. The construction samples integer columns in a box with finite-field norm congruence conditions and deletes the few small triangles; is explicit but extremely small. It does not determine the order of : the gap to the upper bound remains, and no conjecture for the true exponent is made. parent of this event
Act on this frontier