lean artifact · pending
Artifact ↗Jacobsthal's quadratic-bound question: is h(k) = O(k^2)?
Theorem 1.1: for an absolute constant and every , uniformly over prime sets and interval positions; in particular , answering Jacobsthal's question and improving Iwaniec's . The proof pushes the linear sieve to its limiting parameter, keeping a boundary term, and controls the discrepancy with the actual residue classes through an inverse estimate and stopped counts. The constant is not explicit, and the true order of (Erdos #970's broader ask) is not determined: the gap to the lower bound near remains. Theorem 1.2 of the same paper also bounds the quantity in Erdős Problem #687: every choice of one class per prime leaves survivors below , so ; the connection was pointed out in a VibeMathed submission on 14 October 2026.
Exact FrontierDelta
Scope and record
Occurred: Sep 25, 2026
Delta type: SOURCE CLAIM
Assumptions: VibeMathed verification: lean-checked. Publication: announcement. AI contribution: ai-discovered. VibeMathed editorial classifications, scores, notes, relations, and dataset structure are CC BY 4.0. Source statements and linked content retain their own rights.
Canonical aliases: Jacobsthal's quadratic-bound question: is h(k) = O(k^2)? · Jacobsthal quadratic bound · Problem 970
Confidence: Not scored
Registry verification: lean checked · announcement · candidate
Attribution
VibeMathed
registry · event recorded by
Unreleased internal OpenAI model
model · ai model contributor · OpenAI
Artifacts and verifiers
Compute record
No linked compute attempts recorded.
Lineage and corrections
Lean: OAI/NumberTheory/Jacobsthal/Conclusions/QuadraticBound.lean (erdos_970_quadratic) evidence for this event
This event attributed to Unreleased internal OpenAI model
Jacobsthal's quadratic-bound question: is h(k) = O(k^2)? parent of this event
VibeMathed record: Jacobsthal's quadratic-bound question: is h(k) = O(k^2)? evidence for this event
Erdos Problem #970 evidence for this event
Jacobsthal's quadratic-bound question: is h(k) = O(k^2)? evidence for this event
Theorem 1.1: for an absolute constant and every , uniformly over prime sets and interval positions; in particular , answering Jacobsthal's question and improving Iwaniec's . The proof pushes the linear sieve to its limiting parameter, keeping a boundary term, and controls the discrepancy with the actual residue classes through an inverse estimate and stopped counts. The constant is not explicit, and the true order of (Erdos #970's broader ask) is not determined: the gap to the lower bound near remains. Theorem 1.2 of the same paper also bounds the quantity in Erdős Problem #687: every choice of one class per prime leaves survivors below , so ; the connection was pointed out in a VibeMathed submission on 14 October 2026. parent of this event
Act on this frontier