Source authenticated

Petersen Coloring Conjecture

This preprint was not the first disproof. A 68-vertex counterexample was posted to X on 23 July 2026 by @NeuralReformist, credited to GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra, sixteen days earlier. This site decoded that sparse6 string and checked it independently: 68 vertices, 102 edges, simple, cubic, connected, bridgeless, girth five, and no Petersen coloring under the same encoder used for the 112-vertex graph. Whether the two are independent is unknown - the preprint does not cite the post. The headline axes still record the preprint, the only complete writeup with certificates. The implication runs one way: the Petersen coloring conjecture implies Berge-Fulkerson and the 5-cycle-double-cover conjecture, so refuting it leaves both of those open. The paper does not claim 112 is minimum, and it supplies a second, nonisomorphic $D_3$-symmetric 112-vertex counterexample. Combined with a theorem of Ma, Mattiolo, Steffen and Wolf, one counterexample yields infinitely many.

Exact FrontierDelta

Prior state unknowndisproved

Scope and record

Occurred: Jul 23, 2026

Delta type: SOURCE CLAIM

Assumptions: VibeMathed verification: site-confirmed. Publication: preprint. AI contribution: ai-co-developed. Imported under CC BY 4.0.

Canonical aliases: Petersen Coloring Conjecture · Petersen Coloring

Confidence: Not scored

Registry verification: site confirmed · preprint · resolved

Open the source record ↗

Attribution

VibeMathed
registry · event recorded by

Bryce Putman
human · human collaborator

ChatGPT
model · ai model contributor · OpenAI

Artifacts and verifiers

Zenodo artifact record v1.1.0 (CNFs, DRAT certificates, hashes)

code · pending

Artifact ↗

Compute record

No linked compute attempts recorded.

Lineage and corrections

This event attributed to Bryce Putman

This event attributed to ChatGPT

Act on this frontier

Verify, challenge, or extend the result.

Petersen Coloring Conjecture — Mathematical Frontier Network