Source authenticated

The polynomial removal conjecture for ordered binary matrices

Theorem 1.1: there is a fixed binary 66×6666\times66 matrix HH such that for every h≥1h\ge1, with nh=(386h+2)2hn_h=(386h+2)2^h and ϵh=(386h+2)−2\epsilon_h=(386h+2)^{-2}, some AhA_h is ϵh\epsilon_h-far from HH-free yet NH(Ah)≤ϵh2−hnh132N_H(A_h)\le\epsilon_h2^{-h}n_h^{132}; hence no polynomial removal bound holds for this HH, and the finite-family question fails for one square pattern. Corollary: canonical row-column sampling testers need exp⁡(Ω(ϵ−1/2))\exp(\Omega(\epsilon^{-1/2})) samples along this sequence. Not shown: which patterns do admit polynomial removal, or a counterexample smaller than 66×6666\times66.

Exact FrontierDelta

Prior state unknown→disproved

Scope and record

Occurred: Sep 25, 2026

Delta type: SOURCE CLAIM

Assumptions: VibeMathed verification: lean-checked. Publication: announcement. AI contribution: ai-discovered. VibeMathed editorial classifications, scores, notes, relations, and dataset structure are CC BY 4.0. Source statements and linked content retain their own rights.

Canonical aliases: The polynomial removal conjecture for ordered binary matrices · Polynomial ordered matrix removal

Confidence: Not scored

Registry verification: lean checked · announcement · candidate

Open the source record ↗

Attribution

VibeMathed
registry · event recorded by

Unreleased internal OpenAI model
model · ai model contributor · OpenAI

Artifacts and verifiers

Lean challenge statement: MatrixRemoval.lean

lean artifact · pending

Artifact ↗
Lean solution module: OAI/Combinatorics/MatrixRemoval/Main.lean

lean artifact · pending

Artifact ↗

Compute record

No linked compute attempts recorded.

Lineage and corrections

Theorem 1.1: there is a fixed binary 66×6666\times66 matrix HH such that for every h≥1h\ge1, with nh=(386h+2)2hn_h=(386h+2)2^h and ϵh=(386h+2)−2\epsilon_h=(386h+2)^{-2}, some AhA_h is ϵh\epsilon_h-far from HH-free yet NH(Ah)≤ϵh2−hnh132N_H(A_h)\le\epsilon_h2^{-h}n_h^{132}; hence no polynomial removal bound holds for this HH, and the finite-family question fails for one square pattern. Corollary: canonical row-column sampling testers need exp⁡(Ω(ϵ−1/2))\exp(\Omega(\epsilon^{-1/2})) samples along this sequence. Not shown: which patterns do admit polynomial removal, or a counterexample smaller than 66×6666\times66. parent of this event

The polynomial removal conjecture for ordered binary matrices evidence for this event

This event attributed to Unreleased internal OpenAI model

The polynomial removal conjecture for ordered binary matrices parent of this event

VibeMathed record: The polynomial removal conjecture for ordered binary matrices evidence for this event

Lean challenge statement: MatrixRemoval.lean evidence for this event

Alon-Ben-Eliezer, Efficient removal lemmas for matrices (Problem 1.4) evidence for this event

Gishboliner-Shapira, Polynomial property testing (Conjecture 4.5 in arXiv v1) evidence for this event

Lean solution module: OAI/Combinatorics/MatrixRemoval/Main.lean evidence for this event

Act on this frontier

Verify, challenge, or extend the result.