Source authenticated

The Projected Lax Conjecture: is every hyperbolicity cone a spectrahedral shadow?

Theorem 1.1: there exists a real homogeneous hyperbolic polynomial whose closed hyperbolicity cone admits no finite semidefinite lift (exact equality, no closure). The cone comes from a positive semidefinite matrix-valued quadratic map QQ via an affine section EQ={(A,t,y):A⪰0, t≥tr(A†Q(y))}E_Q=\{(A,t,y):A\succeq0,\ t\ge\mathrm{tr}(A^\dagger Q(y))\}, and a local sums-of-squares obstruction in the spirit of Scheiderer rules out every lift. This also disproves the generalized Lax conjecture. It is an existence result in high dimension, not an explicit polynomial and not a lower bound on lift size. Note the explicit cone of the September 24 companion does have an exact lift (size 100 pencil, 307 auxiliary variables).

Exact FrontierDelta

Prior state unknown→disproved

Scope and record

Occurred: Oct 5, 2026

Delta type: SOURCE CLAIM

Assumptions: VibeMathed verification: unreviewed. Publication: announcement. AI contribution: ai-discovered. VibeMathed editorial classifications, scores, notes, relations, and dataset structure are CC BY 4.0. Source statements and linked content retain their own rights.

Canonical aliases: The Projected Lax Conjecture: is every hyperbolicity cone a spectrahedral shadow? · Projected Lax Conjecture

Confidence: Not scored

Registry verification: unreviewed · announcement · candidate

Open the source record ↗

Attribution

VibeMathed
registry · event recorded by

Unreleased internal OpenAI model
model · ai model contributor · OpenAI

Lineage and corrections

Theorem 1.1: there exists a real homogeneous hyperbolic polynomial whose closed hyperbolicity cone admits no finite semidefinite lift (exact equality, no closure). The cone comes from a positive semidefinite matrix-valued quadratic map QQ via an affine section EQ={(A,t,y):A⪰0, t≥tr(A†Q(y))}E_Q=\{(A,t,y):A\succeq0,\ t\ge\mathrm{tr}(A^\dagger Q(y))\}, and a local sums-of-squares obstruction in the spirit of Scheiderer rules out every lift. This also disproves the generalized Lax conjecture. It is an existence result in high dimension, not an explicit polynomial and not a lower bound on lift size. Note the explicit cone of the September 24 companion does have an exact lift (size 100 pencil, 307 auxiliary variables). parent of this event

The Projected Lax Conjecture: is every hyperbolicity cone a spectrahedral shadow? evidence for this event

This event attributed to Unreleased internal OpenAI model

Companion: An Exact Semidefinite Lift of a Nonspectrahedral Hyperbolicity Cone evidence for this event

Companion: A nonspectrahedral hyperbolicity cone evidence for this event

Netzer and Sanyal 2015 (DOI) evidence for this event

VibeMathed record: The Projected Lax Conjecture: is every hyperbolicity cone a spectrahedral shadow? evidence for this event

The Projected Lax Conjecture: is every hyperbolicity cone a spectrahedral shadow? parent of this event

Act on this frontier

Verify, challenge, or extend the result.