The Optimal Approximation Ratio for Permanents of PSD Matrices
What is the best deterministic polynomial-time approximation ratio for the permanent of a Hermitian positive semidefinite matrix? Resolved up to lower-order terms in the exponent: an explicit concave maximisation $\widehat P(A)$ satisfies $e^{-\gamma n}\widehat P(A) \le \mathrm{per}(A) \le \widehat P(A)$, giving a deterministic $e^{(\gamma+\varepsilon)n}$-approximation for every $\varepsilon > 0$ and matching the known $e^{(\gamma-\varepsilon)n}$ hardness, where $\gamma$ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant.
Exact FrontierDelta
Scope and record
Occurred: May 21, 2026
Delta type: SOURCE CLAIM
Assumptions: VibeMathed verification: unreviewed. Publication: preprint. AI contribution: ai-co-developed. Imported under CC BY 4.0.
Canonical aliases: The Optimal Approximation Ratio for Permanents of PSD Matrices · PSD permanent approximation
Confidence: Not scored
Registry verification: unreviewed · preprint · resolved
Attribution
VibeMathed
registry · event recorded by
Nima Anari
human · human collaborator
Farzam Ebrahimnejad
human · human collaborator
GPT 5.5 Pro Extended
model · ai model contributor · OpenAI
Lineage and corrections
This event attributed to Farzam Ebrahimnejad
This event attributed to Nima Anari
This event attributed to GPT 5.5 Pro Extended