Source authenticated

The Optimal Approximation Ratio for Permanents of PSD Matrices

What is the best deterministic polynomial-time approximation ratio for the permanent of a Hermitian positive semidefinite matrix? Resolved up to lower-order terms in the exponent: an explicit concave maximisation $\widehat P(A)$ satisfies $e^{-\gamma n}\widehat P(A) \le \mathrm{per}(A) \le \widehat P(A)$, giving a deterministic $e^{(\gamma+\varepsilon)n}$-approximation for every $\varepsilon > 0$ and matching the known $e^{(\gamma-\varepsilon)n}$ hardness, where $\gamma$ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant.

Exact FrontierDelta

Prior state unknownproved

Scope and record

Occurred: May 21, 2026

Delta type: SOURCE CLAIM

Assumptions: VibeMathed verification: unreviewed. Publication: preprint. AI contribution: ai-co-developed. Imported under CC BY 4.0.

Canonical aliases: The Optimal Approximation Ratio for Permanents of PSD Matrices · PSD permanent approximation

Confidence: Not scored

Registry verification: unreviewed · preprint · resolved

Open the source record ↗

Attribution

VibeMathed
registry · event recorded by

Nima Anari
human · human collaborator

Farzam Ebrahimnejad
human · human collaborator

GPT 5.5 Pro Extended
model · ai model contributor · OpenAI

Lineage and corrections

This event attributed to Farzam Ebrahimnejad

This event attributed to Nima Anari

This event attributed to GPT 5.5 Pro Extended

Act on this frontier

Verify, challenge, or extend the result.