Indexed metadata

Sharp connectivity thresholds for mixed rigidity packings and improved bounds for highly connected orientations of graphs

Hanzhi Bai, Jørgen Bang-Jensen, Jin Yan

Source record

Source: arXiv

Published: Sep 21, 2026

arXiv: 2609.24463

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

Garamvölgyi, Jordán, Király and Villányi [{{\bf Forum Math. Pi} \textbf{13} (2025), Paper No.~e11}] posed two sharp connectivity conjectures for packing rigid spanning subgraphs: one for the equal-dimensional case and the other for the packing of a dd-rigid spanning subgraph with a spanning tree. We prove a unified theorem: for arbitrary positive integers d1,,dsd_1,\ldots,d_s, every i=1sdi(di+1)\sum_{i=1}^{s}d_i(d_i+1)-connected graph contains pairwise edge-disjoint spanning subgraphs H1,,HsH_1,\ldots,H_s such that HiH_i is did_i-rigid for every ii. The connectivity bound is sharp whenever i=1sdi(di+1)4\sum_{i=1}^{s}d_i(d_i+1)\ge4. As special cases, the theorem settles both conjectures, confirms the conjecture of Garamvölgyi, Jordán and Király [{\bf J. Combin. Theory Ser. B} \textbf{166} (2024), 1--29] that every tk(k+1)tk(k+1)-connected graph contains tt pairwise edge-disjoint kk-connected spanning subgraphs, and gives the sharp threshold d(d+1)+2rd(d+1)+2r for packing one dd-rigid spanning subgraph together with rr pairwise edge-disjoint spanning trees. We also obtain two upper bounds related to Thomassen's conjecture on highly connected orientations of graphs. If f(q)f(q) is the least integer such that every f(q)f(q)-connected graph has a qq-connected orientation, then f(q)(25q2+41q16)/2f(q)\le(25q^2+41q-16)/2 for every q3q\ge3 and f(q)8q2+212q+1404=(8+o(1))q2f(q)\le8q^2+212q+1404=(8+o(1))q^2 for all sufficiently large qq; these two results reduce the leading coefficient in the previous quadratic bound from 320320 to 25/225/2 for every q3q\ge3 and 88 for all sufficiently large qq. Compared to the bound for f(q)f(q) obtained by Garamvölgyi et al. we obtain the better bounds, not only through our tight rigidity result but also by exploiting the leftover edges when we remove two edge-disjoint spanning (sufficiently) rigid graphs.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.