Indexed metadata

Ramsey Numbers of Trees Versus Odd Cycles

Matthew Brennan

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Jul 8, 2016

DOI: 10.37236/5731

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

Burr, Erdős, Faudree, Rousseau and Schelp initiated the study of Ramsey numbers of trees versus odd cycles, proving that R(Tn,Cm)=2n1R(T_n, C_m) = 2n - 1 for all odd m3m \ge 3 and n756m10n \ge 756m^{10}, where TnT_n is a tree with nn vertices and CmC_m is an odd cycle of length mm. They proposed to study the minimum positive integer n0(m)n_0(m) such that this result holds for all nn0(m)n \ge n_0(m), as a function of mm. In this paper, we show that n0(m)n_0(m) is at most linear. In particular, we prove that R(Tn,Cm)=2n1R(T_n, C_m) = 2n - 1 for all odd m3m \ge 3 and n25mn \ge 25m. Combining this with a result of Faudree, Lawrence, Parsons and Schelp yields n0(m)n_0(m) is bounded between two linear functions, thus identifying n0(m)n_0(m) up to a constant factor.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.