Indexed metadata

Caries imaging using T1 StarVIBE and PETRA sequences compared to normal dental work-up: a proof-of-concept study

Gintare Burian, Jonas Stief, Tobias Greve, Ulrich Grosse, Adib Al-Haj Husain, Gustav Andreisek, Monika Probst, Egon Burian

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Feb 24, 2026

DOI: 10.1007/s11282-026-00908-8

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

Abstract Objectives To compare caries detection using T1-based Free-breathing 3D Stack of Stars GRE (StarVIBE) and T1-weighted pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA) MRI sequences with the gold standard consisting of a combination of clinical evaluation and bitewing radiography. Materials and methods Included subjects were evaluated clinically by a dentist for the occurrence of caries. All subjects underwent bitewing radiographs and MRI of the viscerocranium, including 3D StarVIBE and 3D PETRA sequences. Caries lesions were evaluated for penetration depth (D1-D4). Signal intensity (SI) was measured in dental hard tissue, the pulp and caries lesions. Results 80 teeth were analyzed. Among these, 10 showed caries during clinical assessments and bitewing imaging, all of which were also detected on MRI. Furthermore, 5 additional lesions were identified exclusively on MRI. Overall image quality and diagnostic confidence were significantly higher in PETRA than in StarVIBE (4.7 vs. 3.9, p = 0.006). The SI for caries lesions was significantly higher in the PETRA sequence (-0.5 a.u. ± 1.5 a.u. vs. -4.2 a.u. ± 4.0 a.u., p = 0.002). Caries lesion volume was also significantly larger in PETRA (18 mm 3 ± 14.8 mm 3 ) compared to StarVIBE (11 mm 3 ± 14.8 mm 3 , p = 0.003). Conclusion MRI identified all caries lesions that were detected both clinically and through bitewing imaging, along with additional lesions exclusive to MRI. The PETRA sequence outperformed StarVIBE in quantitative caries visualization.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.