Comprehensive mentoring in developing Deep Learning-based instructional materials for public junior high school mathematics teachers
Umi Farihah, Mohammad Kholil, Siti Khikmatul Munawwaroh, Faishal Tamim, Muhammad Suwignyo Prayogo
Source record
Source: Crossref
Published: Aug 31, 2026
DOI: 10.22219/jcse.v7i2.43934
Open original source ↗Source abstract
Teachers of the MGMP Mathematics at Public Junior High Schools in the Western Region of Jember Regency experience difficulties in developing Deep Learning-based instructional materials. This mentoring program aims to describe teachers’ challenges, formulate mentoring strategies, and explain the outcomes of the implemented strategies. The community service method involved preparation, planning, coordination, implementation, reflection, evaluation, and follow-up. Data were collected through interviews, observations, questionnaires, and documentation. Data analysis employed Miles and Huberman model, including comprising data reduction, data display, conclusion drawing and verification, assisted by NVivo 12 software. The primary challenges involved adapting to changes in Merdeka Curriculum instructional materials and the limited availability of continuous mentoring. Mentoring strategy based on participatory action research was implemented over three meetings. The results demonstrate improvements in teachers’ understanding and skills in developing in-depth learning plans, ability to utilize AI technology, strengthened collaboration and commitment among teachers to implement in-depth learning plans, and the establishment of mentor schools for further mentoring. Thus, this mentoring program plays a role in supporting SDG 4 (Quality Education) by enhancing teachers’ professional competencies and implementing a sustainable mentoring model to support the implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum through a Deep Learning approach.
Evidence graph
No public relationships recorded yet.
Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.