Indexed metadata

Gender Comparisons of Mathematics Attitudes and Affect: A Meta-Analysis

Janet Shibley Hyde, Elizabeth Fennema, Marilyn Ryan, Laurie A. Frost, Carolyn Hopp

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Nov 1, 1990

DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1990.tb00022.x

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

This article reports the complex results of meta-analyses of gender differences in attitudes and affect specific to mathematics. Overall, effect sizes were small and were similar in size to gender differences in mathematics performance. When differences exist, the pattern is for females to hold more negative attitudes. Gender differences in self-confidence and general mathematics attitudes are larger among high school and college students than among younger students. Effect sizes for mathematics anxiety differ depending upon the sample (highly selected or general). One exception to the general pattern is in stereotyping mathematics as a male domain, where males hold much more stereotyped attitudes ( d = -.90). While affect and attitudes toward mathematics are not the only influences on the development of gender differences in mathematics performance, they are important, and both male and female affect and attitudes should be considered in conjunction with other social and political influences as explanations.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.

Gender Comparisons of Mathematics Attitudes and Affect: A Meta-Analysis — Mathematical Frontier Network