Indexed metadata

Upper Tail Bounds for Cycles

Abigail Raz

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Jan 1, 2020

DOI: 10.1137/19m1258827

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

This paper examines bounds on upper tails for cycle counts in Gn,pG_{n,p}. For a fixed graph HH define ξH=ξHn,p\xi_H= \xi_H^{n,p} to be the number of copies of HH in Gn,pG_{n,p}. It is a much studied and surprisingly difficult problem to understand the upper tail of the distribution of ξH\xi_H, for example, to estimate P(ξH>2EξH).\mathbb{P}(\xi_H > 2 \mathbb{E}\xi_H). The best known result for general HH and pp is due to Janson, Oleszkiewicz, and Ruciński [ Israel J. Math., 142 (2004), pp. 61--92], who proved that exp⁡[−OH,η(MH(n,p)ln⁡(1/p))]<P(ξH>(1+η)EξH)<exp⁡[−ΩH,η(MH(n,p))]. \exp[-O_{H, \eta}(M_H(n,p) \ln(1/p))]<\mathbb{P}(\xi_H > (1+\eta)\mathbb{E} \xi_H)<\exp[-\Omega_{H, \eta}(M_{H}(n,p))]. Thus they determined the upper tail up to a factor of ln⁡(1/p)\ln(1/p) in the exponent. There has since been substantial work to improve these bounds for particular HH and pp. We close the ln⁡(1/p)\ln(1/p) gap for cycles, up to a constant in the exponent. Here the lower bound stated above is accurate for ll-cycles when p>ln⁡1/(l−2)nnp> \frac{\ln^{1/(l-2)}n}{n}.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.

Upper Tail Bounds for Cycles — Mathematical Frontier Network