Numerical Assessment of the Thermal and Ventilation Performance of an Earth–Air Heat Exchanger Coupled with a Solar Chimney for Passive Conditioning of Dwellings in a Warm–Humid Climate
Belisario Morales-Morales, Carlos E. Torres-Aguilar, Karla M. Aguilar-Castro, Edgar V. Macias-Melo
Source abstract
Passive cooling strategies are essential to curbing the growing air-conditioning demand of dwellings in warm–humid regions. This work presents a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) study, carried out with the open-source code OpenFOAM, of a passive system that couples an earth–air heat exchanger (EAHE) with a solar chimney (SC) serving a room-representative cavity, i.e., the coupled EAHE–SC device is analyzed together with the room it conditions. The methodology was built progressively: (i) a transient conduction sub-model (laplacianFoam) characterized the thermal inertia of the soil around the buried duct; (ii) a parametric study of eight coupling geometries identified the best relative position of the EAHE and the SC; (iii) three configurations—the complete system, the EAHE + cavity system, and the bare cavity—were solved under identical numerical conditions with the buoyancy-driven solvers of OpenFOAM and the k–ε turbulence model with the Boussinesq approximation; and (iv) the complete system was evaluated for a representative hot and a representative cold design day through a section-based post-processing of the ventilation and thermal-energy indicators. Over the four-day period simulated, the soil behaved as a stable thermal reservoir with no depletion. At the design condition, the complete system reached a mean cavity temperature of 33.2 °C, 8.32 air changes per hour (ACH) and 67.0 W of thermal power removed from the cavity, against 34.4 °C, 2.01 ACH and 4.56 W for the bare cavity; coupling the chimney raised ventilation by 94.8% and 313.9% relative to the EAHE-only and bare-cavity cases, respectively. The design-day comparison showed a marked climate-dependent response: on the hot day the EAHE dominated (air cooled by 5.75 °C, 2.51 ACH), whereas on the cold day the exchanger remained nearly neutral (+0.19 °C) and ventilation dropped to 0.69 ACH, lowering the cavity temperature to 24.1 °C. The results indicate a complementary, mutually reinforcing behavior—the coupled system removes more heat and renews more air than either device does on its own—for the design conditions analyzed.
Evidence graph
No public relationships recorded yet.
Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.