Indexed metadata

Computing Extinction Barriers in a Quorum-Sensing Reaction Network

Mario Ayala, Johannes Zimmer

Source record

Source: arXiv

Published: Sep 30, 2026

arXiv: 2609.39946

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

We introduce a simple reaction-network model of a quorum-sensing population that couples the cell density xx to the signal density ww. In the four-channel cell-signal network studied here, scaling signal production and removal by the same factor rr leaves all deterministic equilibria, and their stability types, unchanged. Nevertheless, we show that rr shifts the quasipotential barrier ΔV(r)ΔV(r) for rare transitions towards extinction, and thus, under metastable exit assumptions, the mean time to reach a fixed neighbourhood of the extinction state on the exponential scale eNΔV(r)e^{NΔV(r)}. We compute the barrier by minimization of the path action with the signal retained as a fluctuating coordinate, and we compare it with exact stochastic simulation of population-threshold crossing times regressed in NN. Over a range of rr, the minimum-action barriers satisfy ΔV(r)=ΔV∞+O(1/r)ΔV(r)=ΔV_\infty+O(1/r), where ΔV∞ΔV_\infty is obtained by eliminating the signal first. At r=1r=1, the barrier is 55% larger than ΔV∞ΔV_\infty. The saddle barrier ΔV(r)ΔV(r) is also the least action needed to enter the basin of extinction, but the density threshold can be crossed more cheaply: at r=0.5r=0.5 the cheapest crossing costs 7.7% less action, keeps the signal high, and is usually followed by recovery. Simulated arrival times in this neighbourhood, which include failed attempts, grow with slopes within two fitted standard errors of the saddle barrier at every tested rate, and within 0.0040.004 of it if the logarithmic prefactor term is omitted. Under either regression model they exclude ΔV∞ΔV_\infty at r≤2r\le2 by at least 4.44.4 fitted standard errors, without using the action solver.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.