Indexed metadata

On Two Problems Regarding the Hamiltonian Cycle Game

Dan Hefetz, Sebastian Stich

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Feb 27, 2009

DOI: 10.37236/117

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

We consider the fair Hamiltonian cycle Maker-Breaker game, played on the edge set of the complete graph KnK_n on nn vertices. It is known that Maker wins this game if nn is sufficiently large. We are interested in the minimum number of moves needed for Maker in order to win the Hamiltonian cycle game, and in the smallest nn for which Maker has a winning strategy for this game. We prove the following results: (1) If nn is sufficiently large, then Maker can win the Hamiltonian cycle game within n+1n+1 moves. This bound is best possible and it settles a question of Hefetz, Krivelevich, Stojaković and Szabó; (2) If n≥29n \geq 29, then Maker can win the Hamiltonian cycle game. This improves the previously best bound of 600600 due to Papaioannou.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.

On Two Problems Regarding the Hamiltonian Cycle Game — Mathematical Frontier Network