Indexed metadata

When are subset sums equidistributed modulo m?

Stan Wagon, Herbert S. Wilf

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Apr 13, 1994

DOI: 10.37236/1183

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

For a triple (n,t,m)(n,t,m) of positive integers, we attach to each tt-subset S={a1,,at}{1,,n}S=\{a_1,\ldots ,a_t\}\subseteq \{1,\ldots ,n\} the sum f(S)=a1++atf(S)=a_1+\cdots +a_t (modulo mm). We ask: for which triples (n,t,m)(n,t,m) are the (nt){n\choose t} values of f(S)f(S) uniformly distributed in the residue classes mod mm? The obvious necessary condition, that mm divides (nt){n\choose t}, is not sufficient, but a qq-analogue of that condition is both necessary and sufficient, namely: qm1q1divides the Gaussian polynomial(nt)q.{{q^m-1}\over {q-1}}\quad \text{divides the Gaussian polynomial}\quad \binom{n}{t}_q. We show that this condition is equivalent to: for each divisor d>1d>1 of mm, we have t modd>n moddt\ {\rm mod}\, d>n\ {\rm mod}\, d. Two proofs are given, one by generating functions and another via a bijection. We study the analogous question on the full power set of [n][n]: given (n,m)(n,m); when are the 2n2^n subset sums modulo mm equidistributed into the residue classes? Finally we obtain some asymptotic information about the distribution when it is not uniform, and discuss some open questions.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.

When are subset sums equidistributed modulo m? — Mathematical Frontier Network