Indexed metadata

The number of maximum primitive sets of integers

Hong Liu, Péter Pál Pach, Richárd Palincza

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Jan 28, 2021

DOI: 10.1017/s0963548321000018

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

Abstract A set of integers is primitive if it does not contain an element dividing another. Let f ( n ) denote the number of maximum-size primitive subsets of {1,…,2 n }. We prove that the limit α = lim n→∞ f ( n ) 1/ n exists. Furthermore, we present an algorithm approximating α with (1 + ε ) multiplicative error in N ( ε ) steps, showing in particular that α ≈ 1.318. Our algorithm can be adapted to estimate the number of all primitive sets in {1,…, n } as well. We address another related problem of Cameron and Erdős. They showed that the number of sets containing pairwise coprime integers in {1,… n } is between 2π(n)⋅e(1/2+o(1))n{2^{\pi (n)}} \cdot {e^{(1/2 + o(1))\sqrt n }} and 2π(n)⋅e(2+o(1))n{2^{\pi (n)}} \cdot {e^{(2 + o(1))\sqrt n }} . We show that neither of these bounds is tight: there are in fact 2π(n)⋅e(1+o(1))n{2^{\pi (n)}} \cdot {e^{(1 + o(1))\sqrt n }} such sets.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.