A note on large values of Dirichlet L -functions for characters of fixed order at 1 divided by 2 less than sigma less than or slanted equals 1 1 / 2 < σ ⩽ 1
YOUNESS LAMZOURI
Source record
Source: Crossref
Published: Sep 10, 2026
DOI: 10.1017/s030500412610228x
Open original source ↗Source abstract
Abstract In this paper, we use a simple argument to show the existence of large values of conjecturally sharp size for Dirichlet L -functions attached to primitive characters of fixed order at sigma element of left parenthesis 1 divided by 2 comma 1 right bracket σ ∈ ( 1 / 2 , 1 ] . More precisely, for every fixed integer g greater than or slanted equals 2 g ⩾ 2 we prove the existence of a primitive character chi χ of order g and conductor upper Q equivalent to x Q ≍ x such that StartAbsoluteValue upper L left parenthesis 1 comma chi right parenthesis EndAbsoluteValue greater than or slanted equals e Superscript gamma Baseline left parenthesis log log x plus log log log x minus log left parenthesis 2 log g right parenthesis plus o left parenthesis 1 right parenthesis right parenthesis period | L ( 1 , χ ) | ⩾ e γ ( log log x + log log log x − log ( 2 log g ) + o ( 1 ) ) . We also show that for every fixed 1 divided by 2 less than sigma less than 1 1 / 2 < σ < 1 there exists a primitive character chi χ of order g and conductor upper Q equivalent to x Q ≍ x such that log StartAbsoluteValue upper L left parenthesis sigma comma chi right parenthesis EndAbsoluteValue greater than or slanted equals left parenthesis upper C Subscript g Baseline left parenthesis sigma right parenthesis plus o left parenthesis 1 right parenthesis right parenthesis left parenthesis log x right parenthesis Superscript 1 minus sigma Baseline left parenthesis log log x right parenthesis Superscript negative sigma Baseline comma log | L ( σ , χ ) | ⩾ ( C g ( σ ) + o ( 1 ) ) ( log x ) 1 − σ ( log log x ) − σ , for some explicit positive constant upper C Subscript g Baseline left parenthesis sigma right parenthesis period C g ( σ ) . Previously, such bounds were known only conditionally on the Generalised Riemann Hypothesis, and even then only in the special cases g equals 2 g = 2 and g equals 3 g = 3 .
Evidence graph
No public relationships recorded yet.
Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.