Indexed metadata

Radical splittings of toric ideals

Anargyros Katsabekis, Apostolos Thoma

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Sep 28, 2026

DOI: 10.1007/s10801-026-01593-w

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

Abstract Let K be a field and let IA⊂K[x1,…,xn]I_A\subset K[x_1,\ldots ,x_n] I A ⊂ K [ x 1 , … , x n ] be a toric ideal. We study when IAI_A I A can be expressed in the form IA=rad(IA1+⋯+IAr), I_A=\textrm{rad}(I_{A_1}+\cdots +I_{A_r}), I A = rad ( I A 1 + ⋯ + I A r ) , where IAi≠IAI_{A_i}\ne I_A I A i ≠ I A for every i . In particular, we provide a necessary and sufficient condition for such a decomposition with r=2r=2 r = 2 . We also introduce the radical splitting number of IAI_A I A , denoted by Splitrad(IA)\textrm{Split}_{\textrm{rad}}(I_A) Split rad ( I A ) , and compute its exact value for several classes of toric ideals, with particular emphasis on toric ideals arising from graphs. Specifically, we show that Splitrad(IA)=3\textrm{Split}_{\textrm{rad}}(I_A)=3 Split rad ( I A ) = 3 for toric ideals of complete bipartite graphs, except for the toric ideal of K2,2K_{2,2} K 2 , 2 . We also prove that Splitrad(IA)\textrm{Split}_{\textrm{rad}}(I_A) Split rad ( I A ) coincides with the binomial arithmetical rank for toric ideals of height 2.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.