Indexed metadata

‘Not bullet proof’: The complex choice not to seek a civil protection order for intimate partner violence

Jill Theresa Messing, Meredith E Bagwell-Gray, Allison Ward-Lasher, Alesha Durfee

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Feb 18, 2021

DOI: 10.1177/0269758021993338

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

Protection orders (POs) are one legal system resource available to survivors of intimate partner violence. Many survivors choose not to obtain a PO, yet prior research has not examined the perspectives of these survivors. This study examined the open-ended survey responses ( n = 308) regarding the choice not to obtain a PO by survivors residing in emergency shelters in the United States. Content analysis indicated that many survivors made deliberate decisions to not seek safety through this venue. Survivors indicated that a PO may increase their partner’s violence, identified substantial barriers, evaluated a PO as unnecessary, preferred alternative strategies, were dealing with complex partner dynamics, and chose to protect their loved ones by not seeking a PO. Women with marginalized identities, in particular, indicated that there are multiple costs to seeking interventions within the legal system. Structural changes are needed within the legal system to facilitate access to justice for survivors.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.

‘Not bullet proof’: The complex choice not to seek a civil protection order for intimate partner violence — Mathematical Frontier Network