Indexed metadata

Cutoff profiles and boundary effects in the Togashi-Kaneko model of autocatalytic reactions with weak mutations

Yangrui Xiang, Wasiur R. KhudaBukhsh

Source record

Source: arXiv

Published: Oct 13, 2026

arXiv: 2610.17775

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

We determine explicit bulk and worst-case total variation cutoff profiles for the configuration law of a two-species Togashi--Kaneko model with a fixed population of nn particles and weak mutations. Boundary initial conditions introduce an additional logarithmic growth phase and change both the leading mixing-time coefficient and the limiting cutoff profile. Let κ1,κ2>0κ_1,κ_2>0 be the autocatalytic rate constants and put λ∗=κ1κ2/(κ1+κ2)λ_*=κ_1κ_2/(κ_1+κ_2). For deterministic initial configurations whose density converges to m∈(0,1)m\in(0,1), the total variation distance to equilibrium at time tn(s)=log⁡n2λ∗+sλ∗t_n(s)=\frac{\log n}{2λ_*}+\frac{s}{λ_*} converges to G(r(m)e−s)\mathcal G(r(m)e^{-s}) for every fixed s∈Rs\in\mathbb R, where G(r)=dTV(N(r,1),N(0,1))\mathcal G(r)=d_{\mathrm{TV}}(\mathcal N(r,1),\mathcal N(0,1)), r(m)>0r(m)>0 is explicit, and N(a,b2)\mathcal N(a,b^2) denotes the Gaussian distribution with mean aa and variance b2b^2. For the worst-case distance Dn(t)\mathscr D_n(t) over all initial configurations, we prove Dn(Tn+s/λ∗)→P(s)\mathscr D_n(T_n+s/λ_*)\to\mathcal P(s), where Tn=(1min⁡{κ1,κ2}+12λ∗)log⁡nT_n=\left(\frac{1}{\min\{κ_1,κ_2\}}+\frac{1}{2λ_*}\right)\log n.The profile P\mathcal P is the total variation distance between the equilibrium Gaussian and a Gaussian mixture whose random displacement is determined by a gamma-distributed amplitude arising from early growth at the boundary. Unlike the bulk profile, P\mathcal P depends on the mutation parameters. Both cutoffs have windows of constant order, and we identify the asymptotically worst boundary configurations.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.