Indexed metadata

Sharp Edge-Edit Bounds at Every Level for Leaky Positive Semidefinite Forcing

Domenico Frijio

Source record

Source: arXiv

Published: Sep 19, 2026

arXiv: 2609.22804

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

This work disproves the 1-leaky positive semidefinite edge-deletion conjecture and replaces it with a sharp theorem. For every leak level \ell and edge ee, one has Z()+(G)Z()+(Ge)2|Z^+_{(\ell)}(G)-Z^+_{(\ell)}(G-e)|\le 2. More generally, if two graphs differ only on edges with both endpoints in SS, their parameters differ by at most S|S|. An endpoint-sensitive refinement recovers an increase of at most one whenever some minimum set for GeG-e contains an endpoint of ee. Both signs are sharp for every positive leak level. Joining two copies of K+1K_{\ell+1} by a bridge gives Z()+(G)=2Z^+_{(\ell)}(G)=2\ell and Z()+(Ge)=2+2Z^+_{(\ell)}(G-e)=2\ell+2. For every 2\ell\ge 2, a connected clique-leaf pair of order 2+32\ell+3 gives the opposite difference. The remaining positive-difference one-leak case is attained by connected graphs on nine vertices with Z(1)+(H)=4Z^+_{(1)}(H)=4 and Z(1)+(G)=6Z^+_{(1)}(G)=6. Explicit forcing sequences, fort certificates, and an exact verifier check the finite extremal example and stress-test the general results.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.