AI-Driven Hybrid SAST–DAST–SCA–IAST Framework for Risk-Based Vulnerability Prioritization in Microservice Architectures
Daoquan Zhou
Source record
Source: Crossref
Published: Feb 12, 2026
DOI: 10.20944/preprints202602.0769.v1
Open original source ↗Source abstract
Microservice-based architectures introduce highly distributed and rapidly evolving attack surfaces that overwhelm traditional vulnerability management processes with excessive security findings lacking actionable prioritization. This paper presents an AI-driven hybrid security testing framework that unifies Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), and Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST) into a single risk-centric vulnerability analytics pipeline. By jointly leveraging abstract syntax tree semantics, taint propagation reasoning, runtime exploit traces, and SBOM-derived dependency exposure, the proposed system constructs a rich, multi-dimensional representation of each vulnerability. A machine-learning prioritization model then infers exploit likelihood and business impact, reducing false positives by 46–57%, improving prioritization accuracy by up to 115% over CVSS and 48.9% over EPSS, and eliminating duplicate or unreachable findings. Practical deployment in DevSecOps workflows demonstrates 44–52% reductions in Mean Time To Remediate (MTTR) and 88–93% stabilization in CI/CD risk drift, enabling efficient remediation of vulnerabilities that pose the highest real-world threat. A privacy-preserving IRX processing mechanism further ensures secure cloud-side analytics without exposing proprietary code. Extensive experiments on benchmark and industrial microservice systems validate that the proposed approach provides actionable, exploitability-aware, and operationally impactful vulnerability prioritization for modern distributed architectures.
Evidence graph
No public relationships recorded yet.
Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.