Proof of the Riemann Hypothesis via the Chebyshev Function and the Integral Convergence
Hao-Cong Wu
Source record
Source: Crossref
Published: Aug 3, 2026
DOI: 10.20944/preprints202605.1525.v3
Open original source ↗Source abstract
In this article, we offer a complete, self-contained, and entirely elementary proof of the mean-square estimate for the Chebyshev function. From this we deduce the convergence of the integral is valid, thus proving the validity of the Riemann hypothesis. The proof primarily employs elementary estimates of the Chebyshev function, the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, a dyadic decomposition, and Abel summation, in which the argument results of this article are already optimal within the elementary framework and sufficient to derive the convergence of the required integral that it is a suffficient condition for the Riemann hypothesis. In particular, we also provide a theoretical complement linking integral convergence, pointwise bounds and analyticity, and concludes that the well-known -bound is valid, thereby reconfirming the validity of the Riemann hypothesis. In other words, we give a self-contained elementary proof for the mean-square estimate that where is the Chebyshev function. From this we deduce that holds for every thus concluding the integral converges absolutely for every so that the integral converges conditionally for every whereas the integral converges conditionally so then the Riemann hypothesis is true. In particular, we conclude that the property of absolute convergence of the integral for every is equivalent to the property of conditional convergence of the integral for every either of which is equivalent to the property of the -bound: for every and all of them imply the -bound: is also valid for every which is the well-known equivalent form of the Riemann hypothesis, thus reconfirming the validity of the Riemann hypothesis.
Evidence graph
No public relationships recorded yet.
Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.