Indexed metadata

Prescribed-Difference Matchings with Four and Eight Holes: Fourier Filters for Compatible Boundaries

Avraham Kreindel, Aryeh Lev Zabokritskiy

Source record

Source: arXiv

Published: Aug 27, 2026

arXiv: 2608.27547

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

Let s2s\geq 2 and let v1,,v2s1F2s{0}v_1,\ldots,v_{2^{s-1}}\in F_2^s\setminus\{0\} have sum zero. The prescribed-difference matching problem asks whether F2sF_2^s can be partitioned into pairs whose differences, counted with multiplicity, are exactly these vectors. Fix a hyperplane HF2sH\leq F_2^s. An hh-hole instance is one in which exactly hh prescribed differences lie in HH, counted with multiplicity. We prove that every four-hole instance has a solution for s3s\geq 3 and every eight-hole instance has a solution for s4s\geq 4. Thus no restriction on the multiplicities or on the sum of the holes is needed beyond the global zero-sum condition. After the internal pairs are placed, their endpoints are deleted from the two affine halves determined by HH, and the remaining vectors must be paired with the prescribed crossing differences. A locally valid placement of the internal pairs need not admit such a completion. We encode the possible completions by coefficients of signed determinants and use the Walsh transform to sum over all disjoint legal placements while keeping the crossing profile fixed. Nonvanishing of this sum guarantees that at least one placement extends to a full matching. The four-hole and zero-sum eight-hole theorems are proved theoretically. The general eight-hole proof uses three finite exact verifications, independent of the crossing profile: a local filter calculation, a classification of the remaining eight-hole configurations, and integer certificates for those configurations. The verification software, exact inputs, and recorded outputs are archived in a versioned Zenodo record.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.