Indexed metadata

A unified family of counterexamples to Batyrev's non-negativity conjecture on stringy Hodge numbers

Dimitrios I. Dais

Source record

Source: arXiv

Published: Sep 6, 2026

arXiv: 2609.06829

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

Recently, Huang and Satriano determined the sharp dimension threshold for Batyrev's non-negativity conjecture on stringy Hodge numbers: the conjecture holds in dimensions at most four and fails in every dimension at least five. We show that their counterexamples fit into a single broad three-parameter family Ym,d:=V(i=0msigi(x)+h(x))Pm+d+1Y_{m,d}:=V(\sum_{i=0}^m s_i g_i(x)+h(x))\subset\mathbb{P}^{m+d+1}, where each gig_i is homogeneous of degree d1d-1 and hh is homogeneous of degree dd, whose singular locus is a linear space ΛPmΛ\cong\mathbb{P}^m. Blowing up ΛΛ gives a log resolution with one smooth exceptional divisor of discrepancy one. We compute the Hodge-Deligne polynomials of both the resolution and the exceptional divisor from their projective-space fibrations over Pd\mathbb{P}^d, derive a master formula for Est(Ym,d×(P1)n)E_{\mathrm{st}}(Y_{m,d}\times(\mathbb{P}^1)^n), and prove the structure formula hstp,q(Ym,d×(P1)n)=Ap,q+Bp,qCp,qh_{\mathrm{st}}^{p,q}(Y_{m,d}\times(\mathbb{P}^1)^n)=A_{p,q}+B_{p,q}-C_{p,q}, where the three terms are non-negative. Thus the only possible source of negativity is Cp,q-C_{p,q}, which is governed by the primitive middle cohomology of Zm,d=V(g0,,gm)PdZ_{m,d}=V(g_0,\ldots,g_m)\subset\mathbb{P}^d. Off the diagonal, every negative entry equals Cp,q-C_{p,q}, a binomially weighted sum of shifted primitive Hodge numbers of Zm,dZ_{m,d}. On the diagonal, the behaviour is governed by the parity of m+dm+d. We also obtain a complete classification for 0md10\le m\le d-1, d3d\ge3, and n1n\ge1. The only non-counterexamples are (m,d)=(0,3)(m,d)=(0,3) for every n1n\ge1, and (m,d)=(2,3)(m,d)=(2,3) for n4n\ge4.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.