Mechanics of adhesive failure. II
E. H. Andrews, Anthony James Kinloch
Source record
Source: Crossref
Published: Mar 27, 1973
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1973.0033
Open original source ↗Source abstract
Abstract In the preceding Part I of this investigation a relation was derived among the measured failure energy, θ, the energy dissipated viscoelastically during joint separation, and an intrinsic failure energy θ0, for various rubber-to-polymer substrate joints. For some joints, θ0 was equal to the thermodynamic work of adhesion WA, but for others θ0 ≫ WA. By the use of a variety of microscopical and spectroscopical techniques it is shown in the present paper that when θ0 ≈ WA, joint failure is wholly interfacial, but that θ0 ≫ WA when substantial cohesive failure occurs during joint separation. It is shown that the intrinsic failure energy (which controls the total failure energy under given conditions) may be expressed as θ0 = iI + rJ0 + 8F, where i, r and s are the area fractions of interfacial failure, rubber cohesive failure and substrate cohesive failure respectively and I, J0 and F are the corresponding failure energies (per area). For purely interfacial failure, i = 1 and I = WA. For strong joints, however, about 70 to 80 % of the value of θ0 is provided by the term rJ0. The departures from interfacial failure, which occur only with etch-treated substrate films, can be attributed to covalent bonding across the interface during cure of the elastomer. The reactive groups in the substrate are C=C double bonds produced by the etching treatment.
Evidence graph
No public relationships recorded yet.
Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.