Indexed metadata

The Onus of Proof of Aboriginal Title

Kent McNeil

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Oct 1, 1999

DOI: 10.60082/2817-5069.1515

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

In the Delgamuukw decision, the Supreme Court of Canada clearly placed the onus on the Aboriginal nations to prove their title by showing occupation of lands at the time the Crown asserted sovereignty. In this article, it is argued that the common law could assist them in this respect. They should be able to rely on present or past possession to raise a presumption of Aboriginal title, and so shift the burden onto the Crown to prove its own title. Moreover, Aboriginal nations may be more successful if they bring an action for trespass or for recovery of possession of land, rather than for declaration of Aboriginal title.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.

The Onus of Proof of Aboriginal Title — Mathematical Frontier Network