Indexed metadata

Visibility Sets, Empty Pentagons, and Sufficient Conditions for Hexagons

Carlos M. Nicolas

Source record

Source: arXiv

Published: Oct 16, 2026

arXiv: 2610.23553

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

Given a set SS of nn points in general position in the plane, we define the CC-set C(p,q)C(p,q) of an oriented edge (p,q)(p,q) as the set of extreme points of the visibility set V(p,q)V(p,q) facing (p,q)(p,q). Since every point of V(p,q)V(p,q) that is not in C(p,q)C(p,q) gives rise to an empty convex pentagon having (p,q)(p,q) as a boundary edge, it is natural to study the properties of CC-sets in order to bound the number of empty convex pentagons of SS. We prove tight bounds on the intersection size and union complexity of CC-sets sharing an endpoint. We also consider the problem of bounding the number of empty pentagons and hexagons in terms of the number of interior and boundary points of SS. While the hexagon bound is weak, it offers a potential step toward a superlinear lower bound. On the other hand, the two-parameter bound for pentagons, combined with the structural results on CC-sets, yields a simple proof of an Ω(n3/2)Ω(n^{3/2}) bound for the number of pentagons. While this is a significant improvement over previously published bounds, a recent preprint \cite{Astudillo2026} attains a better bound using completely different methods. Thus, the primary contribution of this paper lies in the structural results about CC-sets and the two-parameter bounds for empty pentagons and hexagons.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.