Indexed metadata

Exact and asymptotic enumeration of unrestricted binary phylogenetic networks through automorphism weights

Josep Batle

Source record

Source: arXiv

Published: Oct 2, 2026

arXiv: 2610.03856

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

Let $\cP_{\ell,k}$ be the set of rooted binary phylogenetic networks with ℓ\ell labelled leaves, kk reticulations and no parallel edges. We write $|\cP_{\ell,k}|=W_k(\ell)+D_k(\ell)$, where the weighted count Wk(ℓ)W_k(\ell) adds the inverse orders of the leaf-fixing automorphism groups and the defect Dk(ℓ)D_k(\ell) collects the remainder. The weighted count satisfies, for every kk, a recursion over the source layers of the tree-component structure that involves neither a list of component graphs nor any distinction between symmetric and asymmetric configurations, and its exponential generating function is a Laurent polynomial in 1−2x\sqrt{1-2x}. Automorphism groups of networks are 22-groups, elementary abelian for k≤5k\le5 but not in general. For k≤5k\le5 the defect is the weighted count of networks with a distinguished involution, which obeys an extension of the same recursion. An exact symbolic evaluation of the two recursions yields $|\cP_{\ell,k}|$ in closed form for k≤5k\le5, the case k=5k=5 being new; it reproduces the published counts for k≤4k\le4 and corrects a coefficient in a published generating function for k=3k=3. For every kk, uniformly over explicit ranges of kk, we prove that the non-tree-child networks are a fraction 2k(k−1)/ℓ2k(k-1)/\ell of the tree-child networks to leading order, which gives the third term of the asymptotic expansion of $|\cP_{\ell,k}|$. We also prove that reticulation-visible networks exceed tree-child networks by the fraction k(k−1)/ℓk(k-1)/\ell, and that a uniformly random network in $\cP_{\ell,k}$ has a nontrivial automorphism with probability k(k−1)/(4ℓ3)k(k-1)/(4\ell^3) to leading order.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.