Indexed metadata

Evaluating the Evidence Base for Cognitive Strategy Instruction and Mathematical Problem Solving

Marjorie Montague, Samantha Dietz

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Apr 1, 2009

DOI: 10.1177/001440290907500302

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

This review considers both the content and methodologies of 5 single-subject and 2 group experimental design studies investigating the effects of cognitive strategy instruction on the mathematical problem solving of students with disabilities, using quality indicators proposed by Horner et al. (2005) and Gersten et al. (2005). Findings indicated that the research base of both single-subject and group experimental studies did not meet the methodological criteria to support cognitive strategy instruction as an evidence-based practice for improving mathematical problem solving of students with disabilities. The shortcomings identified in the empirical literature supporting cognitive strategy instruction, however, can be addressed in future intervention studies bearing in mind the quality indicators and standards for determining evidence-based practices.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.

Evaluating the Evidence Base for Cognitive Strategy Instruction and Mathematical Problem Solving — Mathematical Frontier Network