Indexed metadata

Efficacy and safety of Bio 3D conduits composed of human umbilical cord–derived mesenchymal stromal cells: A proof-of-concept study in a canine ulnar nerve defect model

Kazuaki Fujita, Ryosuke Ikeguchi, Tomoki Aoyama, Takashi Noguchi, Koichi Yoshimoto, Daichi Sakamoto, Terunobu Iwai, Tetsuya Miyamoto, Yudai Miyazaki, Shizuka Akieda, Tokiko Nagamura-Inoue, Fumitaka Nagamura, Koichi Nakayama, Shuichi Matsuda

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Jul 1, 2025

DOI: 10.1177/09636897251361711

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

Peripheral nerve injuries involving nerve defects remain challenging to treat. Although autologous nerve grafting is considered the gold standard, it has notable limitations, including donor site morbidity. To address this, we developed a scaffold-free Bio 3D conduit composed of human umbilical cord–derived mesenchymal stromal cells (UC-MSCs) using bioprinting technology. In this study, we evaluated its efficacy and safety in a canine ulnar nerve defect model. At 10 weeks postoperatively, the Bio 3D group showed better motor and sensory recovery compared with the allograft group, as demonstrated by the pinprick test, electrophysiological studies, and hypothenar muscle wet weight (0.978 ± 0.100 vs. 0.637 ± 0.151, n = 3). Morphometric analysis revealed greater axonal regeneration, including larger myelinated axon diameters (4.27 ± 0.342 µm vs. 3.69 ± 0.161 µm, n = 3) and thicker myelin sheaths (0.621 ± 0.088 µm vs. 0.497 ± 0.021 µm, n = 3). Immunostaining showed that the number of transplanted UC-MSCs diminished over time, likely after exerting their therapeutic effects. No adverse events, systemic abnormalities, or distant human cell migration was observed. These findings suggest that UC-MSC–derived Bio 3D conduits are a promising alternative for peripheral nerve regeneration, especially for patients wishing to avoid donor nerve harvesting.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.