Indexed metadata

Onto-semiotic complexity of the Definite Integral

María Burgos, Seydel Bueno, Olga Pérez, Juan D. Godino

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Feb 24, 2021

DOI: 10.17583/redimat.2021.6778

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

Teaching and learning Calculus concepts and procedures, particularly the definite integral concept, is a challenge to teachers and students in their academic careers. In order to develop an informed plan for improving instructional processes, it is necessary to pay attention to the nature and complexity of the mathematical features of the definite integral, that students are expected to understand and apply. In this research, we supplement the analysis made by different authors, applying the theoretical and methodological tools of the Onto-Semiotic Approach to mathematical knowledge and instruction. The goal is to understand the diverse meanings of the concept of the definite integral and potentials semiotic conflicts based on the given data. We focus attention on a first intuitive meaning, which involves mainly arithmetic knowledge, and the definite integral formal meaning as Riemann’s sums limit predominantly in the curricular guidelines. The recognition of the onto-semiotic complexity of mathematics objects is considered as a key factor in explaining the learning difficulties of concepts, procedures and its application for problem-solving, as well as to make grounded decisions on teaching. The methodology analysis of a mathematical text, which we exemplify in this work applying the tools of Onto-Semiotic Approach, provides a microscopic level of analysis that allows us to identify some semiotic-cognitive facts of didactic interest. This also allows for the identification of some epistemic strata, that is, institutional knowledge that should have been previously studied, which usually goes unnoticed in the teaching process.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.