Isolation of Regular Graphs and k-Chromatic Graphs
Peter Borg
Source record
Source: Crossref
Published: Jun 27, 2024
DOI: 10.1007/s00009-024-02680-7
Open original source ↗Source abstract
Abstract Given a set F of graphs, we call a copy of a graph in F an F -graph. The F -isolation number of a graph G , denoted by ι ( G , F ) , is the size of a smallest set D of vertices of G such that the closed neighborhood of D intersects the vertex sets of the F -graphs contained by G (equivalently, G - N [ D ] contains no F -graph). Thus, ι ( G , { K 1 } ) is the domination number of G . For any integer k ≥ 1 , let F 1 , k be the set of regular graphs of degree at least k - 1 , let F 2 , k be the set of graphs whose chromatic number is at least k , and let F 3 , k be the union of F 1 , k and F 2 , k . Thus, k -cliques are members of both F 1 , k and F 2 , k . We prove that for each i ∈ { 1 , 2 , 3 } , $$\frac{m+1}{{k \atopwithdelims ()2} + 2}$$ m + 1 k 2 + 2 is a best possible upper bound on ι ( G , F i , k ) for connected m -edge graphs G that are not k -cliques. The bound is attained by infinitely many (non-isomorphic) graphs. The proof of the bound depends on determining the graphs attaining the bound. This appears to be a new feature in the literature on isolation. Among the result’s consequences are a sharp bound of Fenech, Kaemawichanurat, and the present author on the k -clique isolation number and a sharp bound on the cycle isolation number.
Evidence graph
No public relationships recorded yet.
Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.