Indexed metadata

Averages of Artin characters and their relation to the Davenport--Heilbronn theorem

Victor Ahlquist

Source record

Source: arXiv

Published: Oct 1, 2026

arXiv: 2610.01837

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

We bound the error term in the counting function of cubic extensions of Q\mathbb{Q} by Oε(Xθ+ε)\mathcal{O}_ε\left(X^{θ+ε}\right), with θ<2/3θ< 2/3, improving upon results due to Bhargava, Taniguchi, and Thorne. The proof proceeds by relating a certain discriminant-reducing sieve, due to Bhargava, Shankar, and Tsimerman, to averages of Artin characters associated with the Artin LL-function ζK(s)/ζ(s)ζ_K(s)/ζ(s), with KK a cubic field. Conditional on the Generalised Riemann Hypothesis (GRH) for Dedekind zeta functions ζK(s)ζ_K(s), we obtain further savings and show that the error term is O(X2/3−1/51+ε)\mathcal{O}\left(X^{2/3-1/51+ε}\right). Moreover, for the analogous smooth counting problem, we obtain a bound O(X1/2+ε)\mathcal{O}(X^{1/2+ε}) for the error term, conditionally improving results of Shankar, Södergren, and Templier. Our arguments can also handle finitely many splitting conditions. The methods we use to study cubic fields are natural extensions of methods which are used to study the one-level density associated with the above family of Artin LL-functions. In this direction, we improve the admissible support [−σ,σ][-σ,σ], from the previously known admissible value σ<2/5σ< 2/5, to σ<1σ< 1, conditional on the GRH. This also proves that at least 75%75\% of these LL-functions are non-vanishing at the central point, conditionally improving upon results of Shankar, Södergren and Templier. Finally, one may study similar questions over a rational function field Fq(T)\mathbb{F}_q(T), with qq coprime to 22 and 33. Here, we obtain a proportion of non-vanishing of at least 75%75\% for the analogous family of LL-functions. Furthermore, we obtain a bound O(X1/2+ε)\mathcal{O}(X^{1/2+ε}) for the error term in the counting function of cubic function fields, improving previous results of the author. Over function fields, our results are unconditional.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.