Indexed metadata

Generalized Spectral Characterization of Graphs Revisited

Wei Wang

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Oct 21, 2013

DOI: 10.37236/3748

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

A graph GG is said to be determined by its generalized spectrum (DGS for short) if for any graph HH, HH and GG are cospectral with cospectral complements implies that HH is isomorphic to GG. Wang and Xu (2006) gave some methods for determining whether a family of graphs are DGS. In this paper, we shall review some of the old results and present some new ones along this line of research.More precisely, let AA be the adjacency matrix of a graph GG, and let W=[e,Ae,,An1e]W=[e,Ae,\cdots,A^{n-1}e] (ee is the all-one vector) be its walk-matrix. Denote by Gn\mathcal{G}_n the set of all graphs on nn vertices with det(W)0\det(W)\neq 0. We define a large family of graphs $$\mathcal{F}_n=\{G\in{\mathcal{G}_n}|\frac{\det(W)}{2^{\lfloorn/2\rfloor}}\mbox{is square-free and }2^{\lfloorn/2\rfloor+1}\not|\det(W)\}$$ (which may have positive density among all graphs, as suggested by some numerical experiments). The main result of the paper shows that for any graph GFnG\in {\mathcal{F}_n}, if there is a rational orthogonal matrix QQ with Qe=eQe=e such that QTAQQ^TAQ is a (0,1)-matrix, then 2Q2Q must be an integral matrix (and hence, QQ has well-known structures). As a consequence, we get the conclusion that almost all graphs in Fn\mathcal{F}_n are DGS.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.