Conceptual aspects of Traditional Classical Pedagogy versus Critical Mathematics Education: spaces of tension
Lucas Martini, Elenilton Vieira Godoy
Source record
Source: Crossref
Published: Aug 10, 2025
DOI: 10.46551/emd.v9n18a12
Open original source ↗Source abstract
Among the various debates present in curriculum studies and Mathematics Education, the controversy (Orlandi, 2020a) about the traditional perspective stands out. To explore this issue, we turn to Herbart (1946, 2014) to establish connections between the traditional approach and Critical Mathematics Education (EMC), as proposed by Skovsmose (2001, 2007). The theoretical and methodological basis adopted is based on Orlandi's Discourse Analysis (2017a, 2017b, 2020a, 2020b). As a result, Herbart emphasizes the concept of interest, widely used today, proposed with a focus on life-oriented education. His approach, structured on the pillars of government, instruction, and discipline, conflicts with inequality and the social responsibility of schools, aspects proposed by EMC.
Evidence graph
No public relationships recorded yet.
Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.