Indexed metadata

Restricted Goldbach Sums in Arithmetic Progressions II: Almost-All Theorems for General Moduli

Ibar Federico Anderson

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Oct 13, 2026

DOI: 10.20944/preprints202607.2077.v6

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

For q≥1 q≥1 and gcd(a,q)=1 gcd(a,q)=1 we study the restricted weighted Goldbach sum Ra,q(N)=∑p1+p2=N,  p1≡a (q)(logp1)(logp2) R_{a,q}(N)=\sum_{p_{1}+p_{2}=N,\; p_{1}\equiv a\,(q)} (logp_{1})(logp_{2}) . We show that an odd prime divisor of q q forces Ra,q(N)=Oq(logN) R_{a,q}(N)=O_{q}(logN) on a set of even N N of positive density, so that a main term of size ≍N/φ(q) ≍N/φ(q) can hold on almost all N N only for q=2k q=2^{k} . For q=2k q=2^{k} we state the mean-square estimate ∑N≤X∣Ra,q(N)−Ma,q(N)∣2≪A,qX3(logX)−A \sum_{N\leq X} |R_{a,q}(N)-M_{a,q}(N)|^{2}{\ll }_{A,q}X^{3}(logX)^{-A} for every A>0 A>0 , with Ma,q(N)=2C2φ(q)−1S(N)N M_{a,q}(N)=2C_{2}\varphi (q)^{-1}\mathfrak{S}(N)N , and derive from it that the exceptional set {N≤X:Ra,q(N)=0} \{N\leq X:R_{a,q}(N)=0\} has size ≪A,qX(logX)−A {\ll }_{A,q}X(logX)^{-A} and that ∣Ra,q(N)−Ma,q(N)∣≤N(logN)−3 |R_{a,q}(N)-M_{a,q}(N)|\leq N(logN)^{-3} for all but OA,q(X(logX)−A) O_{A,q}(X(logX)^{-A}) even N≤X N≤X . A ternary anchoring transfer and an unconditional quaternary existence statement via Helfgott’s theorem follow. Part II proves an unconditional limit law: for every fixed integer h≠0 h≠0 , the odd part S0(n)=∏ℓ∣n,ℓ>2(ℓ−1)/(ℓ−2) {\mathfrak{S}}_{0}(n)=\prod_{\mathrm{\ell }\mid n,\mathrm{\ell }\gt 2} (\mathrm{\ell }-1)/(\mathrm{\ell }-2) of the Hardy–Littlewood singular series, evaluated at the shifted primes n=p+h n=p+h , converges in distribution to an explicit random Euler product Yh=∏ℓ>2,ℓ∤haℓBℓ Y_{h}=\prod_{\mathrm{\ell }\gt 2,\mathrm{\ell }\nmid h} a_{\mathrm{\ell }}^{B_{\mathrm{\ell }}} with independent Bernoulli factors P(Bℓ=1)=1/(ℓ−1) \mathbb{P}(B_{\mathrm{\ell }}=1)=1/(\mathrm{\ell }-1) ; we establish convergence of all integer moments, an entire Mellin transform of order at most one, non-atomicity, unbounded support, a superpolynomial upper tail, and strict amplification relative to generic integers. Part III applies this law to the amplitude of the restricted main term along N=p+h N=p+h and, under a stated Hardy–Littlewood-type hypothesis, to the additive richness R(p) R(p) of the prime-generation DAG. Part IV records, as computational findings with stated ranges, an inverse correlation corr(R,H)≈−0.7935 corr(R,H)≈-0.7935 between richness and hub count over the first 5000 primes, of which conditioning on S0(p+1) {\mathfrak{S}}_{0}(p+1) explains about 8%. All numerical constants are enclosed by truncation of the relevant Euler products at P={10}^{7} with an explicit tail bound. The paper does not prove Goldbach’s conjecture or finiteness of the exceptional set.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.