Indexed metadata

Weak rainbow saturation numbers of paths, stars and cycles

Jiawen Bo, Xiaopan Lian, Jianing Liu

Source record

Source: arXiv

Published: Sep 3, 2026

arXiv: 2609.03823

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

An edge-colored graph is \emph{rainbow} if all of its edges receive distinct colors. For a fixed graph HH, an edge-colored graph FF is called weakly HH-rainbow saturated if there exists an ordering e1,e2,,eE(Fˉ)e_1,e_2,\ldots,e_{|E(\bar{F})|} of E(Fˉ)E(\bar{F}) such that, for any edge coloring cc of E(Fˉ)E(\bar{F}) with c(ei)c(ej)c(e_i)\neq c(e_j), there is always a rainbow copy of HH that contains eie_i in F+{e1,e2,,ei}F+\{e_1,e_2,\ldots,e_i\}. The \emph{weak rainbow saturation number} rwsat(n,H)\operatorname{rwsat}(n,H) is the minimum number of edges in a weakly HH-rainbow saturated graph on nn vertices. Li, Ma, and Xie [JGT, 2025] showed that limnrwsat(n,H)n\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{\operatorname{rwsat}(n,H)}{n} exists for every nonempty graph HH. Paths and stars attain, respectively, the minimum and maximum ordinary weak saturation numbers among all trees of the same order. We determine their weak rainbow saturation numbers exactly. For all >30\ell>30, we show that $$ \ell+1=\s(n,P_\ell)< \s(n,S_\ell)=\binom{\ell}{2}-1$$ where PP_\ell and SS_\ell denote the path and star on \ell vertices, respectively. Thus, their dependence on \ell is linear for paths and quadratic for stars. We then focus on cycles. Li, Ma, and Xie asked whether rwsat(n,C)\operatorname{rwsat}(n,C_\ell) has leading term 32n\frac32n for every 4\ell\ge4. We answer this question negatively by giving an explicit construction showing that, for every 4\ell\ge4 and all sufficiently large nn, $$\s(n,C_\ell)< \frac{\ell}{\ell-1}n+c_\ell,$$ where cc_\ell depends only on \ell. Since 1<32\frac{\ell}{\ell-1}<\frac32, this strictly improves the proposed leading coefficient for every cycle CC_\ell with 4\ell\ge4.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.