Indexed metadata

Hamiltonicity after reversing the directed edges at a vertex of a Cartesian product

Dave Witte Morris

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Jan 4, 2023

DOI: 10.13069/jacodesmath.v10i1.246

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

Let C⃗m\vec{C}_m and C⃗n\vec{C}_n be directed cycles of length mm and nn, with m,n≥3m, n \ge 3, and let P(C⃗m□C⃗n)P(\vec{C}_m \square \vec{C}_n) be the digraph that is obtained from the Cartesian product C⃗m□C⃗n\vec{C}_m \square \vec{C}_n by choosing a vertex vv, and reversing the orientation of all four directed edges that are incident with vv. (This operation is called “pushing” at the vertex vv.) By applying a special case of unpublished work of S. X. Wu, we find elementary number-theoretic necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of a hamiltonian cycle in P(C⃗m□C⃗n)P(\vec{C}_m \square \vec{C}_n). A consequence is that if P(C⃗m□C⃗n)P(\vec{C}_m \square \vec{C}_n) is hamiltonian, then gcd⁡(m,n)=1\gcd(m, n) = 1, which implies that C⃗m□C⃗n\vec{C}_m \square \vec{C}_n is not hamiltonian. This final conclusion verifies a conjecture of J. B. Klerlein and E. C. Carr. Received: 9 April 2022 | Accepted: 9 July 2022

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.

Hamiltonicity after reversing the directed edges at a vertex of a Cartesian product — Mathematical Frontier Network