Indexed metadata

On commuting integer matrices

Jonathan Chapman, Akshat Mudgal

Source record

Source: Crossref

Published: Oct 26, 2026

DOI: 10.1090/tran/9772

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

Given d , N ∈ N d, N \in \mathbb {N} , we define C d ( N ) \mathfrak {C}_d(N) to be the number of pairs of d × d d\times d matrices A , B A,B with entries in [ − N , N ] ∩ Z [-N,N] \cap \mathbb {Z} such that A B = B A AB = BA . We prove that N10≪C3(N)≪N10,N10≪C3(N)≪N10, N 10 ≪ C 3 ( N ) ≪ N 10 , N^{10} \ll \mathfrak {C}_3(N) \ll N^{10}, thus confirming a speculation of Browning–Sawin–Wang. We further establish that C2(N)=K(2N+1)5(1+o(1)),C2(N)=K(2N+1)5(1+o(1)), C 2 ( N ) = K ( 2 N + 1 ) 5 ( 1 + o ( 1 ) ) , \mathfrak {C}_2(N) = K(2N+1)^5 (1 + o(1)), where K > 0 K>0 is an explicit constant. Our methods are completely elementary and rely on upper bounds of the correct order for restricted divisor correlations with high uniformity.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.

On commuting integer matrices — Mathematical Frontier Network