Indexed metadata

Distinguishing Gauss sums

Moshe Adrian, Jack Diamond, Kenneth Kramer, Geo Kam-Fai Tam

Source record

Source: arXiv

Published: Sep 23, 2026

arXiv: 2609.28211

Open original source ↗

Source abstract

Let $\F_q$ be the field of order q=pfq = p^f for prime pp. If G(χ)G(χ) is the Gauss sum attached to a multiplicative character χχ on $\F_q^\times$, then G(χ)=G(χp)G(χ) = G(χ^p). We investigate the converse question: when does the equality of Gauss sums G(χ2)=G(χ1)G(χ_2) = G(χ_1) imply that χ2=χ1pjχ_2 = χ_1^{p^j} for some integer jj. If χ2=χ1pjχ_2 = χ_1^{p^j}, we say that χ1χ_1 and χ2χ_2 are Frobenius-conjugate. We use the Stickelberger factorization of ideals in cyclotomic fields to give an easily testable criterion for equality of Gauss sums, based on pp-adic digit expansion. As an application, we develop several conditions under which Gauss sum equalities between characters on $\F_q^\times$ are explained by Frobenius-conjugacy. For example, if χ1χ_1 has order q1q-1 or 12(q1)\frac{1}{2}(q-1) and G(χ2)=G(χ1)G(χ_2) = G(χ_1), then χ1χ_1 and χ2χ_2 are Frobenius-conjugate. We also include several examples, based on the explicit evaluation of certain {\em pure} Gauss sums by R.J. Evans.

Evidence graph

No public relationships recorded yet.

Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.