Application of Discrete Mathematics in Groundwater Quality Assessment: A Case Study from Rahata Tehsil, Ahilyanagar District, Maharashtra, India
Aruna Santosh Zine, Kotkar Bharti Amol
Source record
Source: Crossref
Published: May 12, 2026
DOI: 10.70102/ijares/v6s1/6-s1-2016
Open original source ↗Source abstract
Discrete mathematics offers powerful analytical tools for modeling and evaluating environmental data, particularly in scenarios involving classification, relational analysis, and pattern enumeration. This study demonstrates the application of set theory, graph theory, and combinatorics to assess groundwater quality parameters from 34 samples (17 tube wells and 17 open wells) collected across 17 villages in Rahata Tehsil, Ahmednagar District, and Maharashtra. Key hydro chemical parameters analyzed include pH, electrical conductivity (EC), major ions (Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, Na⁺, K⁺, HCO₃⁻, Cl⁻, SO₄²⁻), total dissolved solids (TDS), and total hardness. Data discretization enables set-based classification of quality levels, graph-theoretic analysis reveals parameter interdependencies through correlation networks, and combinatorial methods quantify multi-parameter exceedance patterns against Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS IS 10500:2012) drinking water specifications. Results demonstrate strong graph connectivity among salinity-related parameters (EC, TDS, Mg²⁺, Na⁺) with Pearson correlation coefficients exceeding 0.8, indicating geogenic linkages characteristic of basaltic aquifer weathering. Thirty samples (88%) exceeded TDS acceptability limits of 500 mg/L, while combinatorial analysis identified two samples with extreme multi-parameter violations. These discrete mathematical approaches provide a structured, computationally efficient framework for identifying groundwater quality hotspots and supporting sustainable water resource management in semi-arid basaltic terrains.
Evidence graph
No public relationships recorded yet.
Integrity note: This page is a factual metadata record created by deterministic ingestion. It is not a claim that the work moves a mathematical frontier or has been independently verified.